Monday, April 23, 2012

Who had the best claim?


Harold Godwinson was crowned King of England when King Edward died in 1066. But two important people wanted the crown of England. They were Duke William of Normandy and Harald Hadrada , King of Norway. This led to two major battles, which were the Battle of Stromford Bridge and the Battle of Hastings. In the Battle of Stromford Bridge, Harald Hadrada died.  Harold Godwinson was killed in the Battle of Hastings. In the end, Duke William of Normandy became the King of England. In my opinion, Harold Godwinson should have had the best claim to the throne since the past king, King Edward, chose him and the nobles crowned him.  But William made Harold take an oath promising him to help become the king when Harold was captured when he went for a visit to Normandy in 1064. William accused Harold of being an oath-breaker. But Harold only went for a visit and he didn't threaten or harm anyone. William used his connection with King Edward and convinced many people that the King had promised the throne to him.  Harald Harada, King of Norway wanted to be the king as one of his ancestors, King Cnut, had once ruled England, and Hadrada thought it was his turn to be king.   Harold’s brother Tostig wanted revenge against his brother. Hadrada used him to fight against Harold.  Both, Duke William of Normandy and King Harald Hadrada of Norway used violence to fight for the throne but Harold Godwinson did not. So I think he had the best claim to the throne.       






A picture from http://www.rapeofengland.com/resources/King%20Harold.jpg





Monday, April 2, 2012

Values and Choices

Write:
Think about a time you witnessed bullying/ostracism/peer pressure/exclusion/discrimination/violence. How did you respond? How do you wish you had responded? What stopped you from responding that way?


Values and Choices:


belonging
bullying
bystander
conformity
exclusion
inclusion
membership ostracism
peer pressure
victim


Write:
Think about a time you witnessed bullying/ostracism/peer pressure/exclusion/discrimination/violence. How did you respond? How do you wish you had responded? What stopped you from responding that way?


My story tells about racism and heroes as the bystanders. One afternoon my family and I went to eat at a shop. After lunch, we went to the car park which was near a secondary school. School had just finished. Suddenly saw a group of high school Malay boys crowding around an Indian boy. Two of them were holding him by the neck and another person knocked him and punched him in the stomach. I noticed that the Indian boy was wearing a school prefect and heard the Malay boy saying " Tell me you didn't report him" And the Indian boy said " No, I didn't. How many times do I have to tell you!". My personal theory was that that the prefect probably reported a Malay student to the principal. My mom called the police but the Malay policeman called back to say he didn't know where the place was. After a while, he called my mom and asked "Has it finished?” Later on my called to check and the policeman said he was still rounding the area. My mom was so upset and decided to drop the case. I was furious. Weren’t the police suppose to be heroes and solve the case? This was very disappointing. But of course, the police have more power than us. This incident reminded me of the holocaust unit where we learnt about segregation. The powerful Germans killed the Jews because they thought they were more superior than others.



Respond to the questions below
1.Where have we seen examples of bullying/ostracism/exclusion occurring in texts studied so far this year- factual as well as fictional?
In Shadow of the Minatour, an important theme is bullying. Phoenix is bullied by Steve Adams who is big and strong. Phoenix cannot win him in real life but defeats Adams in the game.

In the Boy in Striped pyjamas, the Jews are ostracized by the Germans. They put the Jews in concentration camps and kill them without any mercy.

In the Hunger Games, the Capitol terrorize the Districts and play with their lives. They force them to fight against each other.


The In-Group
Watch the video clip below
Eve S: The In Group


1.Select one line/phrase/group of sentences that are significant to you. Explain why.
“Often our actions are determined by the moment.” Eve ends her presentation with this sentence. I think it means that we sometimes do not think carefully before making decisions and our decisions seem good at that time.


To think about:
How is ostracism different from other forms of bullying? When does ostracizing or excluding someone from a group become part of bullying?

1.What’s familiar about the incident Eve describes? She was talking about bullying in school. She was bullied but later she bullied because she wanted to be accepted.
2.What surprised you? Eve said that usually differences cause hatred but in this case hatred caused the differences.
3. How does Eve’s story relate to bullying? Was she bullied? Did she bully? How would you explain her behavior?( perpetrator/bystander/victim?). make sure you justify( back up your answer.)

She was a victim and then she became a perpetrator herself just to be accepted by the group. She said she did that because she joined a popular girl and mocked another girl.


Psychologists Michael Thompson and Lawrence Cohen point to the powerful influence of peer groups in guiding our behavior: ‘We all know that groups can go terribly astray in terms of their moral reasoning. Everyone not in the group can be considered an outsider, a legitimate target…It affects every group because we are all prone to that feeling of us versus them and the idea that if you’re not with us you’re against us. Speaking out against a risky, immoral or illegal decision is hard to do because that makes you an outsider yourself’.

4.How did Eve’s need to belong affect the way she responded when another girl was being mocked? Why does her response still trouble her? How do you like to think you would have responded to the incident?

She joined the bullies just to feel good and accepted. She can now think about what she did and she knows she is wrong in mocking the girl. If I were in this situation, I would like to be accepted but I would not join the bullies and become a bully myself.

5. Eve concludes “Often being accepted by others is more satisfying than being accepted by oneself, even though the satisfaction does not last.’ What does she mean? We sometimes do things to have more friends or make more friends. The friends may do some nasty things like teasing or even beating up others. Even though you may not like these things, you just join them because you like being part of the gang rather than being alone and become a victim.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Mysterious Major

The Mysterious Major
What did Schmahling mean when he said that in crushing the boy in his classroom, he was destroying something in himself? What was he destroying? How was it like what the Nazis were destroying in the people they ruled?

He meant that he knows how people can be mean even though they dont mean it. Probably the students will now think of him as a old nasty teacher after destroying the little boys joy. The Nazi's were like this because by crushing the German's free speech, they were destroying the German peoples admiring of them, of course this only happend to those people who where against the nazi's doings.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Victory!

I chose the poem victory, because sad and depressing. Mainly because its about how they both have their last moments together. What stood out was how the father spoke to sonia about the last day and the dance. And also how sonia described how the beautiful the moment was. What touched my feeling is how she siad: I DANCED WITH YOU THAT ONE TIME ONLY.HOW SAD YOU WERE, HOW TIRED, LONELY YOU KNEW THAT THEY WOULD “TAKE” YOU SOON, and TO GRASP THIS MOMENT… SENSE THE MOOD;

YOUR ARMS AROUND ME FELT SO GOOD…THE UGLY BARRACKS DISAPPEARED – THERE WAS NO HUNGER… AND NO FEAR.

O WHAT A SIGHT, JUST YOU AND I,

MY LOVELY FATHER (ONCE BIG AND STRONG). And last but not least THERE ARE NO TOOLS TO MEASURE LOVE AND ONLY FOOLS WOULD FAIL TO SCALE

YOUR VICTORY. I dont have a father by my side.... So ill use my mom as an example. That moment when i gained independence in badminton, what i mean by that is i usually cry if i lose a match when i was small, but after that i learned how to accept loss, so usually my mom would pretend to lose in oder for me to win, but this time i told her to play the best she could, i played with my mom for the first time with her actual strength, she made me go back and fourth, and in the end i lost, but now i can beat her but i thank her for teaching me to accept losing and moving on with my life, but i didn't give up yet i trained so hard so that i can be the "best" and now i have many rival to face and beat! This connects me to the poem because it shows the bond between me and my mom having fun, just like sonia and her father.





Here is the actual poem by her: Sonia Weitz Victory











Sunday, February 19, 2012

Hitlers rise to power!































Well i think that when Hindenburg of the weimar republic passed away the Nazi and Adolf hitler was happy since that one enemy was down. During hyperinflation Germany was really upset and was depressed of everything that happened, from the Treaty of Versailles to Germany's Hyperinflation. Of course to Hitler he saw this as a perfect opportunity to gain power. Hitler promised to get rid of the Treaty. After that, Hyperinflation occurred many were poor and some lost jobs and business crashed, etc, In the crisis, people wanted someone to blame, and looked to extreme solutions. Hitler offered them both, and Nazi success in the elections grew. Germans turned to Nazism because they were desperate. The number of Nazi seats in the Reichstag rose from 12 in 1928 to 230 in July 1932. This depression was like a gift because for every problem the Nazi Party had come up with an explanation or promise. These included, promise to get rid of the hated Weimar government and replace it with a strong leader-Hitler, a promise to get people back to work on road building and public works, and a promise to deal with a communist take-over. The people agreed an was happy to Hitlers idea. In November 1932, Hitler, in the Reichstag elections, the Nazi Party won 37.3% of the votes (230 seats) proving the Nazi party to be the most popular party. Hindenburg and Papen came up with a plan to get the Nazis on their side by offering to make Hitler vice chancellor. He refused and demanded to be made chancellor. They agreed, thinking they could control him. Later, President Hindenburg however, despised Hitler and appointed Franz Von Papen as his chancellor.
General Von Schleicher stopped supporting Von Papen and decided he himself should become chancellor. This triggered off a power struggle between Von Schleicher and Von Papen, which ended up with them handing power to Hitler. In the end Hitler became chancellor and that is how he gained power.









Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Numberg Laws

1. Who could now be defined as a "Jew"?2. What was meant by "Aryanizing" Jewish Businesses?3. How were Jews who were professionals (lawyers, doctors etc.) restricted?4. What did Jewish identity cards need to include now?5. What was the "Law for the Protection of the Hereditary Health of the German People" (sum up in your own words)?This blog entry is worth 10 pts. 2 pts. for each well constructed and thorough answer. This is due on Wednesday, Feb. 15.






1: If anyone who had three or four Jewish grandparents was defined as a Jew, OR anyone who praticed Chirstanity.

2: This meant that Jewish workers and managers were dismissed, and the ownership of most Jewish businesses was taken over by non-Jewish Germans who bought them at bargain prices fixed by Nazi.

3: Jewish doctors were forbidden to help non-Jews, and Jewish lawyers were not permitted to practice law.

4: They were required to carry identity cards, but the government added special identifying marks to theirs: a red "J" stamped on them and new middle names for all those Jews who did not possess recognizably "Jewish" first names -- "Israel" for males, "Sara" for females. Such cards allowed the police to identify Jews easily.

5: The law was to make two couples that wanted to get married get a certificate from the public health authorities to prove that they are both fit to marry each other. Some certificate were not given to people who had "hereditary illnesses" and contagious diseases and those attempting to marry in violation of the Nuremberg Laws.




Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Hitler Takes Control: Targeting the Communists and other Political Parties


Civil rights are personal rights guaranteed and protected by the Country or believe you follow. Some cvil important to me regarding Malaysia rights are Freedom of Speech and Expression, Freedom of religion and etc. Nazi Party were good environmentalists which of course would be good for everybody. They alos provided financial and social aid to people. Not to mention the soldiers got to enter peoples house and make anyone a suspect. The people liked this because then they could get rid of the spies in Germany. Also when Reichstag was burned down. Hitler blamed it on the Communist and therefore, the Germans said that they should be punished for what they did,the punishment was the end of the the Civil rights for the Communist. Hitler was very happy due to the fact he disliked the Communist.